<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Small talk &#187; Philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jurnan.eu/category/philosophy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jurnan.eu</link>
	<description>&#34;I would never die for my beliefs because I might be wrong&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:55:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Intelligent design</title>
		<link>http://jurnan.eu/2010/08/intelligent-design/</link>
		<comments>http://jurnan.eu/2010/08/intelligent-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reckless Rose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jurnan.eu/?p=707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Around us we perceive a world that marvels us in many ways. On the
one hand we have the beauties of nature, on the other her waves of
terror. Most of it seems to be in harmony and to a human time-frame
almost ever-lasting, as long as mankind does not interfere radically. I
remember well that – at junior [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jurnan.eu/2010/08/intelligent-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Russell &amp; Metzinger: The transparency of conciousness</title>
		<link>http://jurnan.eu/2010/06/russell-metzinger-the-transparency-of-conciousness/</link>
		<comments>http://jurnan.eu/2010/06/russell-metzinger-the-transparency-of-conciousness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reckless Rose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jurnan.eu/?p=658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some professional philosophers stir your imagination, while others create doubt as to whether to laugh or cry. Very few of them have been able to extend their sphere of influence beyond the boundaries of universities, but there are – gladly – a number of exceptions. One of those exceptions goes by the name of Bertrand [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jurnan.eu/2010/06/russell-metzinger-the-transparency-of-conciousness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unnatural ethics &amp; relativism</title>
		<link>http://jurnan.eu/2010/02/unnatural-ethics-relativism/</link>
		<comments>http://jurnan.eu/2010/02/unnatural-ethics-relativism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reckless Rose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jurnan.eu/?p=507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nature is fact, leading to descriptive and explanatory accounts, while morality concerns values and norms. So in an often heard fallacy evolution is somehow tied to ethical randomness.  How do we tie what is good to some objective standard? Is everything allowed, now that ‘there is no God in which to ground morality&#8217;?
Well of course [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jurnan.eu/2010/02/unnatural-ethics-relativism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bayes strength</title>
		<link>http://jurnan.eu/2009/12/bayes-strength/</link>
		<comments>http://jurnan.eu/2009/12/bayes-strength/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reckless Rose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jurnan.eu/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article is mainly focused on Bayesianism, a popular interpretation of the concept of probability used to evaluate hypothesis and justify the extent to which we feel confident that they are true. It replaces in part the famous, or infamous, problem of induction. The problem of induction was first explicitly brought to light by David [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jurnan.eu/2009/12/bayes-strength/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Naturalism at its Brightest</title>
		<link>http://jurnan.eu/2009/11/naturalism-at-its-brightest/</link>
		<comments>http://jurnan.eu/2009/11/naturalism-at-its-brightest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reckless Rose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jurnan.eu/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I posted several days before, Richard Dawkins’ made ‘The out campaign’ see the light of day. This nice little example of creationist activity in an actual sense bears many relations with events happening in real life. Time to point towards another worthwhile initiative, called the Brights.
It focuses on more or less the same people [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jurnan.eu/2009/11/naturalism-at-its-brightest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Being conscious of an un-transparent processes</title>
		<link>http://jurnan.eu/2009/08/being-conscious-of-an-un-transparent-processes/</link>
		<comments>http://jurnan.eu/2009/08/being-conscious-of-an-un-transparent-processes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reckless Rose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consciousness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jurnan.eu/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A stone step to the phenomenal self model &#38; what it is like to see
Religion taught us to be satisfied with what we know, yet we no longer regard our bodies to be driven by souls or a spark of life. We have been pushed around, from the corner of behaviorism to quasi-scientific Cartesian theatres.  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jurnan.eu/2009/08/being-conscious-of-an-un-transparent-processes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
